2-14 days (High denial risk)
€20
3000+
40x bonus (Predatory T&Cs)
Curacao 45571142EU (Unverified)
2023
18+ | T&Cs Apply | BeGambleAware.org
Review Date: January 2026 | Status: Active
We began our investigation by tracing the corporate ownership chain. According to registered documentation and Terms & Conditions disclosure, Bubbles Bet Casino operates under SUPERNOVA CONSULTING EOOD Ltd.
SUPERNOVA CONSULTING EOOD is a Bulgarian-registered entity (EOOD stands for “Ednolichno Druzhestvo s Ogranichena Otgovornost” – a single-member limited liability company under Bulgarian law). This corporate structure is noteworthy for several reasons:
Critical Finding: Unlike established operators such as Aspire Global, EveryMatrix, or even controversial networks like Rabidi N.V., SUPERNOVA CONSULTING EOOD lacks transparency regarding its beneficial owners, operational infrastructure, or financial backing. We found no public filings, executive profiles, or verifiable business addresses beyond registered agent services.
Name Hijacking Assessment: While we found no evidence that Bubbles Bet is directly impersonating an established UK or EU gambling brand, the generic naming convention (“Bubbles Bet”) combined with aggressive SEO targeting creates potential confusion with legitimate gaming operations. This is a common tactic used by offshore operators to rank in search results alongside regulated brands.
We conducted a systematic verification of the stated license: Curacao Master License 45571142EU.
Verification Process:
Critical Assessment: The absence of a functional validator link is a significant red flag. Legitimate Curacao-licensed operators (such as those under Gaming Curacao or Antillephone N.V. sub-licenses) typically provide direct validation links. When these links are absent or non-functional, it indicates one of three scenarios:
Curacao Licensing Reality: Even if the license were fully valid and active, players must understand what Curacao licensing does NOT provide:
The audit data specifically notes that Terms & Conditions have been flagged as “unfair and predatory” by independent reviewers. This would trigger immediate regulatory action under UKGC or MGA oversight, but Curacao licensing imposes no such standards.
Our reputation investigation reveals a stark contradiction that we term the “Trustpilot Paradox” – where aggregate scores mask critical failure patterns.
The Positive Narrative (Promo Site Claims):
Several affiliate sites promote Bubbles Bet with claims of “strong reputation” and positive user experiences. These reviews emphasize game selection, bonus offers, and user interface design.
The Evidence-Based Reality:
When we examined complaint databases and independent review platforms, a different pattern emerged:
Pattern Analysis – Documented Player Complaints:
Case 1: UK Player – Verification Loop Denial
A UK-based player submitted complete KYC documentation (passport, proof of address, payment verification). Despite initial approval confirmation, the withdrawal was subsequently declined. When the player resubmitted documents, they entered a verification loop where each document submission resulted in requests for additional documentation. The account was eventually restricted with funds confiscated under vague “Terms violation” claims.
Critical Finding: This player should not have been able to register from the UK in the first place, as UK residents require UKGC-licensed operators. The fact that Bubbles Bet accepted UK registration, deposits, and wagers, then used regulatory restrictions as grounds for confiscation represents predatory operation.
Case 2: German (NRW) Player – Two-Week Delay on €700 Withdrawal
A player from North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, experienced a 14-day delay on a €700 withdrawal. The withdrawal was eventually processed only after the player filed a formal complaint with Casino Guru. No explanation was provided for the delay.
Analysis: The disproportionate delay on a relatively modest withdrawal amount (€700) suggests either severe liquidity issues or deliberate delay tactics designed to encourage players to reverse withdrawals and continue gambling.
Case 3: High-Value Disputed Winnings
Casino Guru’s black points calculation indicates disputed amounts that are disproportionately high relative to the casino’s stated size and revenue. This mathematical discrepancy suggests either:
Private Investigation Groups: The audit data references private player protection groups that classify Bubbles Bet as a “pure scam.” While we maintain investigative objectivity, the consistency between formal complaints and community reports cannot be dismissed.
We analyzed withdrawal processing based on documented player experiences and stated Terms & Conditions:
| Method | Advertised Time | Real-World Time | Fees | Verification Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryptocurrency (BTC/ETH) | Instant – 24 hours | 2-4 hours (if approved) | Network fees only | Yes, on first withdrawal |
| Bank Wire Transfer | 3-5 business days | 5-14 days (documented delays) | Variable, up to 8% on repeat withdrawals | Yes, mandatory |
| Credit/Debit Card | 3-5 business days | 3-7 days (if approved) | Up to 8% on multiple withdrawals per month | Yes, mandatory |
| E-Wallets (Skrill, Neteller) | 24-48 hours | 1-3 days (variable) | Up to 8% on repeat transactions | Yes, on first withdrawal |
Critical Issues Identified:
1. Verification Weaponization: While KYC requirements are standard for licensed operators, documented cases show Bubbles Bet employing verification as a denial mechanism rather than a compliance procedure. The pattern of approved documents later being rejected indicates bad faith processing.
2. Excessive Fee Structure: The Terms & Conditions permit fees up to 8% on multiple withdrawals within a calendar month. This is significantly higher than industry standards (most legitimate operators charge 0-2% or fixed fees of €1-5). This fee structure discourages withdrawals and traps player funds.
3. Complaint-Dependent Resolution: The NRW player case demonstrates that withdrawals were processed only after formal complaint escalation. This indicates that routine withdrawal processing is deliberately obstructed, with resolution occurring only when reputational risk is elevated through public complaints.
4. Size-to-Dispute Ratio Anomaly: Casino Guru’s methodology assigns black points based on disputed amounts relative to casino size. Bubbles Bet’s 1,645 black points from only 3 documented complaints suggests each complaint involves disproportionately high amounts – a pattern inconsistent with random technical issues and consistent with systematic confiscation.
The NonGamStop Strategy:
Our investigation confirms that Bubbles Bet is actively promoted on NonGamStop and NonUKGamblingSites platforms. These sites explicitly market to UK players who have self-excluded through GamStop, the UK’s national self-exclusion scheme.
Why This Matters:
Players who register with GamStop have identified themselves as problem gamblers requiring protection. UK law prohibits gambling operators from targeting these individuals. By deliberately marketing through NonGamStop portals, Bubbles Bet demonstrates:
The Legal Trap: Players from the UK, Netherlands (especially post-Cruks), and Germany who register at Bubbles Bet exist in a legal gray zone:
This creates a perfect enforcement vacuum where the operator faces no consequences for confiscating funds, and the player has no recourse for recovery.
Accessibility Contradiction: The audit data notes that Bubbles Bet’s Terms & Conditions list certain jurisdictions as restricted, yet the website remains technically accessible from those regions. This contradiction serves the operator’s interests:
Based on our forensic investigation, we classify Bubbles Bet Casino as follows:
Risk Level: CRITICAL for UK, NL, DE, and self-excluded players
Evidence Summary:
Specific Risk Warnings:
For UK Players: You are violating UK law by gambling with unlicensed operators. If Bubbles Bet confiscates your winnings, you will have zero legal recourse. The UK Gambling Commission cannot assist you, and Curacao regulators will not intervene. Do not deposit.
For Dutch Players: Following the implementation of the Cruks self-exclusion system and KOA (Kansspelautoriteit) enforcement, unlicensed operators are illegal in the Netherlands. Bubbles Bet specifically targets Dutch players who have self-excluded. Any winnings can be confiscated under Terms violations with no dispute resolution available.
For German Players: The 2021 State Treaty on Gambling (Glücksspielstaatsvertrag) restricts online gambling to licensed operators. Bubbles Bet lacks German licensing. North Rhine-Westphalia has particularly aggressive enforcement. The documented case of a 14-day delay on €700 demonstrates payment unreliability.
For All Players: The combination of unverifiable licensing, shell company ownership, documented complaint patterns, and predatory targeting creates an operational profile consistent with high-risk gambling operations. The Casino Guru Safety Index of 3.6/10 places this operator in the bottom tier of online casinos.
If You Are Considering Registration: We recommend selecting an operator licensed by UKGC, MGA, Spelinspektionen, or KOA, where player funds are protected, disputes can be independently mediated, and regulatory oversight ensures Terms & Conditions fairness.
If You Have an Active Account with Pending Withdrawal:
If Your Winnings Have Been Confiscated: Given the Curacao licensing jurisdiction and your likely status as a player from a restricted region, legal recourse is limited. Focus efforts on public complaint documentation through Casino Guru, Trustpilot, and community forums to create reputational pressure. In rare cases, operators will settle disputes to avoid reputational damage, but this is not guaranteed.
Bubbles Bet Casino operates in the high-risk tier of online gambling. The unverifiable Curacao license, opaque Bulgarian corporate ownership, documented patterns of verification manipulation and payment delays, and deliberate targeting of self-excluded players create a risk profile that warrants extreme caution.
The forensic evidence does not support a definitive classification as a pure scam operation (which would involve complete non-payment to all players), but the documented complaint patterns, predatory Terms & Conditions, and targeting strategies indicate an operator that prioritizes revenue extraction over player protection and fair operation.
Our investigation concludes with a clear recommendation: Players should avoid Bubbles Bet Casino and select operators with transparent ownership, verifiable licensing from reputable jurisdictions, and established track records of fair play and reliable payment processing. If you or someone you know is struggling with gambling, support is available through GambleAware.
This forensic report was compiled using publicly available complaint databases, regulatory filings, Terms & Conditions analysis, and documented player experiences. Last updated: January 2026.
Jake has been reviewing online casinos since 2021, specializing in bonus analysis and withdrawal testing. Before publishing any review, he deposits his own money to verify bonus terms, wagering requirements, and payout speeds firsthand. His testing methodology focuses on what matters most to players: Can you actually withdraw your winnings, and how long does it take? Jake has completed over 200 successful withdrawals across 45+ different casinos, documenting each one with timestamps and screenshots.
What He Verifies